386 research outputs found

    Cost of myopia correction: a systematic review

    Get PDF
    Myopia is one of the leading causes of visual impairment globally. Despite increasing prevalence and incidence, the associated cost of treatment remains unclear. Health care spending is a major concern in many countries and understanding the cost of myopia correction is the first step eluding to the overall cost of myopia treatment. As the cost of treatment will reduce the burden of the cost of illness, this will aid in future cost-benefit analysis and the allocation of healthcare resources, including considerations in integrating eye care (refractive correction with spectacles) into universal health coverage (UHC). We performed a systematic review to determine the economic costs of myopia correction. However, there were few studies for direct comparison. Costs related to myopia correction were mainly direct with few indirect costs. Annual prevalence-based direct costs for myopia ranged from 1426(USA),14-26 (USA), 56 (Iran), and 199(Singapore)percapita,respectively(population:274.63million,75.15million,and3.79million,respectively).Annually,thedirectcostsofcontactlenswere199 (Singapore) per capita, respectively (population: 274.63 million, 75.15 million, and 3.79 million, respectively). Annually, the direct costs of contact lens were 198.30-378.10whilespectaclesandrefractivesurgerieswere378.10 while spectacles and refractive surgeries were 342.50 and $19.10, respectively. This review provides an insight into the cost of myopia correction. Myopia costs are high from nationwide perspectives because of the high prevalence of myopia, with contact lenses being the more expensive option. Without further interventions, the burden of illness of myopia will increase substantially with the projected increase in prevalence worldwide. Future studies will be necessary to generate more homogenous cost data and provide a complete picture of the global economic cost of myopia.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Automated Tessellated Fundus Detection in Color Fundus Images

    Get PDF
    In this work, we propose an automated tessellated fundus detection method by utilizing texture features and color features. Color moments, Local Binary Patterns (LBP), and Histograms of Oriented Gradients (HOG) are extracted to represent the color fundus image. After feature extraction, a SVM classifier is trained to detect the tessellated fundus. Both linear and RBF kernels are applied and compared in this work. A dataset with 836 fundus images is built to evaluate the proposed method. For linear SVM, the mean accuracy of 98% is achieved, with sensitivity of 0.99 and specificity of 0.98. For RBF kernel, the mean accuracy is 97%, with sensitivity of 0.99 and specificity of 0.95. The detection results indicate that color features and texture features are able to describe the tessellated fundus

    Systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related lifestyle on myopia

    Get PDF
    Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic–related lifestyle on myopia outcomes in children to young adults. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases (with manual searching of reference lists of reviews). Studies included assessed changes in myopia-related outcomes (cycloplegic refraction) during COVID and pre-COVID. Of 367 articles identified, 7 (6 prospective cohorts; 1 repeated cross-sectional study) comprising 6327 participants aged 6 to 17 were included. Quality appraisals were performed with Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists. Pooled differences in annualized myopic shifts or mean spherical equivalent (SE) during COVID and pre-COVID were obtained from random-effects models. Results: In all 7 studies, SE moved toward a myopic direction during COVID (vs pre-COVID), where 5 reported significantly faster myopic shifts [difference in means of changes: −1.20 to −0.35 diopters per year, [D/y]; pooled estimate: −0.73 D/y; 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.96, −0.50; P<0.001], and 2 reported significantly more myopic SE (difference in means: −0.72 to −0.44 D/y; pooled estimate: −0.54 D/y; 95% CI: −0.80, −0.28; P<0.001). Three studies reported higher myopia (SE ≤−0.50 D) incidence (2.0- to 2.6-fold increase) during COVID versus pre-COVID. Of studies assessing lifestyle changes, all 4 reported lower time outdoors (pre-COVID vs during COVID: 1.1–1.8 vs 0.4–1.0 hours per day, [h/d]), and 3 reported higher screen time (pre-COVID vs during COVID: 0.7–2.8 vs 2.4–6.9 h/d). Conclusions: This review suggests more myopic SE shifts during COVID (vs pre-COVID) in participants aged 6 to 17. COVID-19 restrictions may have worsened SE shifts, and lifting restrictions may lessen this effect. Evaluations of the long-term effects of the pandemic lifestyle on myopia onset and progression in large studies are warranted to confirm these findings.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    The potential of current polygenic risk scores to predict high myopia and myopic macular degeneration in multi-ethnic Singapore adults

    Get PDF
    Purpose: To evaluate the trans-ancestry portability of current myopia polygenic risk scores (PRS) to predict high myopia (HM) and myopic macular degeneration (MMD) in an Asian population. Design: Population-based study. Subjects: A total of 5,894 (2,141 Chinese, 1,913 Indians, and 1,840 Malays) adults from the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases (SEED) study were included in the analysis. The mean age was 57.0 (standard deviation, SD = 9.31) years. A total of 361 adults had HM (spherical equivalent, SE -0.5D). Methods: The PRS, derived from 687,289 HapMap3 SNPs from the largest genome-wide association study of myopia in Europeans to date (n = 260,974), was assessed on its ability to predict HM and MMD versus controls. Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to predict HM and MMD. Results: The PRS had an AUROC of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.75) for HM and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.70) for MMD versus no myopia controls. The inclusion of the PRS with other predictors (age, sex, educational attainment (EA), and ancestry; age-by-ancestry; sex-by-ancestry and EA-by-ancestry interactions; and 20 genotypic principal components) increased the AUROC to 0.84 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.86) for HM and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.82) for MMD. Individuals with a PRS in the top 5% had 4.66 (95% CI: 3.34, 6.42) times higher risk for HM and 3.43 (95% CI: 2.27, 5.05) times higher risk for MMD compared to the remaining 95% of individuals. Conclusion: The PRS is a good predictor for HM and will facilitate the identification of high-risk children to prevent myopia progression to HM. In addition, the PRS also predicts MMD and will help to identify high-risk myopic adults who require closer monitoring for myopia-related complications.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Light and myopia: from epidemiological studies to neurobiological mechanisms

    Get PDF
    Myopia is far beyond its inconvenience and represents a true, highly prevalent, sight-threatening ocular condition, especially in Asia. Without adequate interventions, the current epidemic of myopia is projected to affect 50% of the world population by 2050, becoming the leading cause of irreversible blindness. Although blurred vision, the predominant symptom of myopia, can be improved by contact lenses, glasses, or refractive surgery, corrected myopia, particularly high myopia, still carries the risk of secondary blinding complications such as glaucoma, myopic maculopathy, and retinal detachment, prompting the need for prevention. Epidemiological studies have reported an association between outdoor time and myopia prevention in children. The protective effect of time spent outdoors could be due to the unique characteristics (intensity, spectral distribution, temporal pattern, etc.) of sunlight that is lacking in artificial lighting. Concomitantly, studies in animal models have highlighted the efficacy of light and its components in delaying or even stopping the development of myopia and endeavoured to elucidate possible mechanisms involved in this process. In this narrative review, we (1) summarize the current knowledge concerning light modulation of ocular growth and refractive error development based on studies in human and animal models, (2) summarize potential neurobiological mechanisms involved in the effects of light on ocular growth and emmetropization and (3) highlight a potential pathway for the translational development of noninvasive light-therapy strategies for myopia prevention in children.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Obesity and the microvasculature

    Get PDF
    Overweight and obesity are thought to significantly influence a person's risk of cardiovascular disease, possibly via its effect on the microvasculature. Retinal vascular caliber is a surrogate marker of microvascular disease and a predictor of cardiovascular events. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the association between body mass index (BMI) and retinal vascular caliber. Relevant studies were identified by searches of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 1966 to August 2011. Standardized forms were used for data extraction. Among over 44,000 individuals, obese subjects had narrower arteriolar and wider venular calibers when compared with normal weight subjects, independent of conventional cardiovascular risk factors. In adults, a 1 kg/m(2) increase in BMI was associated with a difference of 0.07 μm [95% CI: -0.08; -0.06] in arteriolar caliber and 0.22 μm [95% CI: 0.21; 0.23] in venular caliber. Similar results were found for children. Higher BMI is associated with narrower retinal arteriolar and wider venular calibers. Further prospective studies are needed to examine whether a causative relationship between BMI and retinal microcirculation exists

    Developmental synchrony of thalamocortical circuits in the neonatal brain

    Get PDF
    10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.039Neuroimage116168-176GUSTO (Growing up towards Healthy Outcomes

    The influence of the environment and lifestyle on myopia

    Get PDF
    Background: Myopia, commonly known as near-sightedness, has emerged as a global epidemic, impacting almost one in three individuals across the world. The increasing prevalence of myopia during early childhood has heightened the risk of developing high myopia and related sight-threatening eye conditions in adulthood. This surge in myopia rates, occurring within a relatively stable genetic framework, underscores the profound influence of environmental and lifestyle factors on this condition. In this comprehensive narrative review, we shed light on both established and potential environmental and lifestyle contributors that affect the development and progression of myopia. Main body: Epidemiological and interventional research has consistently revealed a compelling connection between increased outdoor time and a decreased risk of myopia in children. This protective effect may primarily be attributed to exposure to the characteristics of natural light (i.e., sunlight) and the release of retinal dopamine. Conversely, irrespective of outdoor time, excessive engagement in near work can further worsen the onset of myopia. While the exact mechanisms behind this exacerbation are not fully comprehended, it appears to involve shifts in relative peripheral refraction, the overstimulation of accommodation, or a complex interplay of these factors, leading to issues like retinal image defocus, blur, and chromatic aberration. Other potential factors like the spatial frequency of the visual environment, circadian rhythm, sleep, nutrition, smoking, socio-economic status, and education have debatable independent influences on myopia development. Conclusion: The environment exerts a significant influence on the development and progression of myopia. Improving the modifiable key environmental predictors like time spent outdoors and engagement in near work can prevent or slow the progression of myopia. The intricate connections between lifestyle and environmental factors often obscure research findings, making it challenging to disentangle their individual effects. This complexity underscores the necessity for prospective studies that employ objective assessments, such as quantifying light exposure and near work, among others. These studies are crucial for gaining a more comprehensive understanding of how various environmental factors can be modified to prevent or slow the progression of myopia
    corecore